Warning: Contains spoilers
I'll be the first to admit it: I had lots of reservations about the Star Trek movie / franchise reboot / thingy. I've always been concerned that, between needing to please the die-hard fans and attracting new viewers, the developers of franchise reboots have so many different people to please. This also goes for film adaptations of books, comics and television shows. The longer-running or more well-known the property, the harder it will be to make a quality product worthy of it.
So it is that I dreaded the potential ass-ness of the new Star Trek film. Star Trek for me has always been about how an enlightened society deals with a galaxy that is not so enlightened. The original series dealt with the political climate of the 1960s, racism, sexism, war, tolerance, self-control, and just how much work it would take for mankind to realize that we're all really just the same inside. Next Generation was better able to paint mankind (and the United Federation of Planets) with the nobility brush, with its sleek design and flashy visual effects. Deep Space Nine opened up new frontiers of conflict and violence with the Jem'Hadar / Federation / Bajor / Cardassian wars. And Voyager taught us what it meant to be lost and alone in the galaxy. Enterprise... well, I never watched Enterprise enough to learn what it had to say, but I'm sure Scott Bakula said it beautifully.
The feature films ranged in quality from terrible to awesome, and for the longest time, fans of Star Trek could count on the curse of the odd-numbered film. This lasted until Nemesis the 10th film in the series, which was terrible. The latest film from J.J. Abrams, is the 11th in the series, but the curse has been broken so it's free to be an awesome film.
Which it is.
As the movie ended, I told the Dorklord, who was seeing the film for the second time, that I take back all the negative things I said about it. Watching the trailer, how could I have known that I would come to accept everything it had to say and actually feel good about flashy effects, young Kirk driving a car, orbital skydiving, and Spock getting medieval on someone's ass? But I did and I'll tell you why.
J.J. Abrams has done everything in his power to make this franchise reboot fresh and exciting for new viewers while remaining true to its characters and stories. Despite the new actors, the new story, and the updated Enterprise, the show feels like Star Trek. Sure, the film explores different parts of the world and the characters than the original series did, but that's to be expected. And not to mention that J.J. Abrams provides a metric truckload of fan service to longtime original Trek fans.
The Good
First and foremost, the casting for the crew was inspired. Each of the bridge crew brought youth and energy to their respective roles without changing the characters Trek fans know and love. Chris Pine brought a lot of Shatner to the role of Kirk by the end of the film, Zachary Quinto was surprisingly sympathetic as Spock, and Karl Urban may as well have been DeForest Kelley's illegitimate son.
Many film adaptations of television shows feel like extended, high-budget episodes, but Star Trek was also a damn good film in addition to being an awesome extended, high-budget television episode. I agree with the Dorklord, who said that this cast could very easily be plunked into the network schedule for a regular series and kick a whole lot of ass. What's not to like? There was so much fan service that it felt like the characters had never left a movie or television screen. Familiar catch phrases or character traits were sprinkled liberally throughout the film, and many lines made reference to events and attitudes in the original series.
The Bad
No film is going to please everyone, and I had a couple of problems with this film. Surprisingly, my issues were technical in nature, as I had only one real problem with the story. Perhaps it's because I was sitting near the front of the theatre, but I felt there was too much shaky-cam and lens flares going on. I'll have to sit farther back for my next viewing to see if it really is a problem, but from up close it was very distracting. Story-wise, I think the only part of hte film I could have done without was the big animal / bigger animal sequence on Delta Vega, where Kirk is pursued by a big animal only to be saved by an even bigger animal which subeqeuntly pursues him.
And that's it. Those are really the only things I didn't like about the film. Pretty good, eh?
The Old
When I first heard that the story of the film revolved around either time travel or alternate dimensions, I was wary. Aside from holodeck malfunctions, time travel is about the weakest and laziest plot device any Star Trek story can have. It's too bad Enterprise decided it would not only make for a good story premise, it would make for a good series premise. But in the film, it worked out rather well. Its effects were minor and it was used to tell a great story that could not have been told any other way. They didn't discuss any of the scientific or technical aspects of time travel, touched on paradox only in passing, and made it seem like a really, really difficult thing to do.
As I mentioned before, characters were unsullied by the passage of time and the new hotness. Kirk is still cognizant of his own awesomeness (and his success with the green ladies), Bones and Spock develop what can only be described as the start of a beautiful enmity, Chekov still has an accent that seems too exaggerated to be natural, and Sulu is still top-notch with a sword. The Enterprise has retained its familiar shape, Starfleet Command still looks pristine and green, and Vulcans still have that darned nerve pinch and mind-meld.
The New
What's new? Well, the Romulans are, for one. While they've retained their close genetic relationship with the Vulcans, the new Romulans are more akin to tattooed space pirates than anything. And it works. They're still just as mean as I remember Romulans being, and their ship designers are still fond of the industrial angular motif.
Being a franchise reboot / thingy, the filmmakers were free to explore different aspects of characters and story, and it was all for the good. While the film also explores the duality of Spock's heritage, it leans more towards his human side as opposed to the original series, which kept Spock mostly Vulcan-y. Another change for Spock? His dad had an enormous jaw and his mom was Winona Ryder! Oh yeah, and he was getting down and dirty with Uhura.
* * *
Yeah, lots of awesome in the new film. I hope it does become a successful film franchise. The world needs more Trek, and I'm cheering for Klingons in the next film. A film full of Klingons with one, single scene depicting a hand-to-hand fight with the Gorn, who are never seen again. Oh yeah, and it has to have the famous fight music. So much potential...
So if you haven't seen it yet, there's really nothing to wait for, no hesitation needed. Just get out there and show Paramount that yes, Trek isn't dead and yes, we want more of it.